Table of Contents
When dealing with digital documents, both digital and electronic signatures offer convenient electronic signing options. While electronic signatures encompass various methods for digitally signing documents, digital signatures provide superior security by leveraging cryptography to verify both the signer’s identity and the document’s integrity. This fundamental security difference is the focus of this article, which delves into the key distinctions between these two signature types.
Technology and Definitions
What Are Electronic Signatures?
An electronic signature (e-signature) broadly refers to any method used to sign a digital document or message. This can include using a stylus on a touchscreen, typing a name, or clicking a checkbox. E-signatures are widely accepted as the digital equivalent of “wet ink” signatures and are legally binding in many countries, including Estonia, Nigeria, the United States, India, the United Arab Emirates, and Singapore. Major global institutions like JPMorgan Chase, UBS Group, Bank of America, Barclays, and Citibank also recognize e-signatures for financial transactions and other purposes.
What Are Digital Signatures?
Digital signatures utilize cryptography to create a unique mathematical “fingerprint” of the signed document. This fingerprint is linked to the signer’s identity through a public key infrastructure (PKI) system. Unlike e-signatures, digital signatures offer a higher level of security and are more tamper-proof. While primarily used in the cryptocurrency sector for payment transactions, digital signatures are gaining traction across traditional industries due to their robust security features.
Key Differences Between Digital Signatures and Electronic Signatures
The key differences between digital and electronic signatures include:
Non-Repudiation
Electronic Signatures: Electronic signatures can be more easily repudiated or denied by the signer as they do not always provide strong evidence of the signer’s intent.
Digital Signatures: They provide strong evidence of the signer’s intent and are more difficult to repudiate or deny, as they are based on cryptographic algorithms.
Level of Security
Electronic Signature: The security level of electronic signatures varies widely. While some methods offer high security, others are susceptible to forgery or tampering. As technology advances, the simpler forms of electronic signatures, such as digital “ink and paper” signatures, typing a name, or checking a box, are increasingly vulnerable, highlighting the need for more secure solutions like digital signatures.
Digital Signature: Digital signatures provide a higher level of security and integrity than electronic signatures. They are more difficult to forge or tamper with because they are based on cryptographic algorithms that ensure the authenticity of the signer and the integrity of the signed document.
Trust
Electronic Signature: Trust in electronic signatures largely depends on the signer, the individual or entity signing the document. Verification involves confirming the signer’s identity and their authority to sign. The technology itself does not inherently provide trust. Instead, it depends on the signer’s reputation and the legal framework governing the signature.
Digital Signature: Conversely, digital signatures depend on encryption technology and other mechanisms to establish trust. They use cryptographic algorithms to create a unique identifier for the signer, ensuring document integrity and authenticity. Trust in a digital signature is derived from the security and reliability of the encryption technology, rather than the signer’s reputation. Even if the signer’s identity is unknown, the digital signature remains trustworthy as long as the encryption technology is secure. Verification through a digital certificate authority or a trusted public key repository adds another layer of validity.
Level of assurance
Electronic Signature: Scanning and uploading a signature poses risks, as there is no concrete evidence that the signature originated from the authentic owner. This method offers lower assurance compared to digital signatures. Impersonators could mimic the signature or unauthorized parties could use a previously scanned signature, prompting financial institutions to implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) in the electronic signature process.
Digital Signature: Cryptographic methods used in digital signatures provide a high level of assurance about the signer’s identity. They are based on a unique key pair: a private key known only to the signer and a public key for verifying the signature.
Legal Standing
As crucial as signing documents and transactions can be, such documents’ legal standing and acceptance are equally important.
Electronic Signature: These are legally accepted in many jurisdictions and countries, supported by legislation such as the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA, 1999) and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN, 2000).
Digital Signature: While UETA and ESIGN also apply to digital signatures in the US, their acceptance and the application of public key infrastructure-based digital signatures vary globally, with some countries imposing limitations.
Conclusion
In the digital landscape, both electronic and digital signatures play important roles. However, digital signatures offer a clear advantage in terms of security and document integrity. Cryptographic algorithms and public key infrastructure (PKI) ensure tamper-proof signatures with strong evidence of the signer’s intent. This superior security is crucial for sensitive transactions and documents requiring absolute trust and authenticity.
As technology progresses and acceptance of blockchain and decentralized technologies expands, traditional organizations will likely embrace digital signatures as a more reliable and secure alternative to electronic signatures. The ability of digital signatures to provide a high level of assurance, even without knowing the signer’s identity, makes them a valuable tool for fostering trust in the digital age.
Identity.com
Identity.com, as a future-oriented company, is helping many businesses by giving their customers a hassle-free identity verification process. Our organization envisions a user-centric internet where individuals maintain control over their data. This commitment drives Identity.com to actively contribute to this future through innovative identity management systems and protocols.
As members of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), we uphold the standards for the World Wide Web and work towards a more secure and user-friendly online experience. Identity.com is an open-source ecosystem providing access to on-chain and secure identity verification. Our solutions improve the user experience and reduce onboarding friction through reusable and interoperable Gateway Passes. Please get in touch for more information about how we can help you with identity verification and general KYC processes.